Crawl websites and extract text content to feed AI models, LLM applications, vector databases, or RAG pipelines. The Actor supports rich formatting using Markdown, cleans the HTML, downloads files, and integrates well with 🦜🔗 LangChain, LlamaIndex, and the wider LLM ecosystem.
Publisher description, verbatim
Last 7 dayson this actor
1other change
Each one reaches followers by email the morning after.Follow this actor
Key figures30 readings
Pricefreefree
Users / 30d13,737↑ 1,900 over 30 readings
Users, all time171,333↑ 11,013 over 30 readings
Runs / 30d3.4m↑ 172,224 over 30 readings
Runs / user / mo244runs per monthly user
Store search presence
11top-10 keywords
best #1 for “content crawler”
content crawler#1
content extractor#1
content scraper#1
8 more#2–#10
re-crawled daily
Recorded changes
2026-10-20changeMomentum shift32% → 1%—on record
2026-10-14schemaInput schema changed—on record
2026-10-12reviewsNew reviews+1 (235 total)+1235 total
showing 3 of 17 in the last 30 days · followers get all 17 by email
What the reviews say
Good at fast, easy, and accurate scraping for many sites with flexible outputs, but fails on tricky sites and captchas, shows inconsistent extraction, enforces page limits, and can be costly.
66 of 66 reviews carry text
Theme
Sentiment
Said
What they mean
Does it run
2 praised · 7 complained
9
usable in cheerio mode as fallbackfrequently errors or returns no results“Did not work. The content on the site is in a JavaScript-rendered table. Even though this actor claims to render JavaScript (tested with both recommended options), it returned nothing. Instead, it just cycled through pages and ran up usage costs.” — 1/5
What it costs
0 praised · 6 complained
6
paywall for important features like email scraping“Why does this need to be a paid AI application? I figured it would scrape what it determines as "important" pages but this is simply scraping every page of a website, this could easily be done with a simple python script and not be paid.” — 1/5
Does it return everything
2 praised · 4 complained
6
supports selecting different output formatsinconsistent extraction; misses emails and websites“Good not great, scarping behind a newpaper paywall i have access to. does some urls, not others, when i redo the ones missed it again does some and not others. basically from a list of 50 urls I've had to scrape 4 times to get the 50” — 3/5
Setup and docs
6 praised · 1 complained
7
easy to use and saves timefails with arbitrary pasted URLs“I am amazed, this is so cool. The scraping with Google Maps was so straightforward, but i notice i couldn't scrape for email without paying.” — 5/5
How fast
2 praised · 1 complained
3
fast and responsive scrapingoccasionally very slow performance“Used this actor and it works perfectly fine. The scraping is fast and accurate.” — 5/5
Caps and ceilings
0 praised · 1 complained
1
hard page-limit imposed per website“Can we maybe not crawl all pages, create a hard limit on pages per website?” — 5/5
What it supports
1 praised · 1 complained
1
covers most websites wellstruggles with more complex or tricky sites“Very good Crawler. Works better than others and is useful for most of the websites. Keen to see if this can be improved for other websites that are tricky to handle.” — 5/5
Is the data right
2 praised · 0 complained
2
accurate extraction and reliable crawl quality“Very happy with the Crawl quality and ability to select different formattings” — 5/5
Does it run
2 ↑ · 7 ↓ of 9
usable in cheerio mode as fallbackfrequently errors or returns no results“Did not work. The content on the site is in a JavaScript-rendered table. Even though this actor claims to render JavaScript (tested with both recommended options), it returned nothing. Instead, it just cycled through pages and ran up usage costs.” — 1/5
What it costs
0 ↑ · 6 ↓ of 6
paywall for important features like email scraping“Why does this need to be a paid AI application? I figured it would scrape what it determines as "important" pages but this is simply scraping every page of a website, this could easily be done with a simple python script and not be paid.” — 1/5
Does it return everything
2 ↑ · 4 ↓ of 6
supports selecting different output formatsinconsistent extraction; misses emails and websites“Good not great, scarping behind a newpaper paywall i have access to. does some urls, not others, when i redo the ones missed it again does some and not others. basically from a list of 50 urls I've had to scrape 4 times to get the 50” — 3/5
Setup and docs
6 ↑ · 1 ↓ of 7
easy to use and saves timefails with arbitrary pasted URLs“I am amazed, this is so cool. The scraping with Google Maps was so straightforward, but i notice i couldn't scrape for email without paying.” — 5/5
Every count is a review we read.
41 of the 66 said only that they liked it, with nothing specific — those are excluded from the themes above.
Quotes are one reviewer, unedited.Read all 66 →
History
30 readings since 2026-09-25
Users / 30d30 readingsUsers, all time30 readingsRuns / 30d30 readings
Follow this actor, compare it against its rivals, and get
every overnight change in one morning report.
Publish it yourself? Claim your publisher page and its full history is
yours free, forever.