apidojo
Tweet Scraper V2 - X / Twitter ScraperLightning-fast search, URL, list, and profile scraping, with customizable filters. At $0.40 per 1000 tweets, and 30-80 tweets per second, it is ideal for researchers, entrepreneurs, and businesses! Get comprehensive insights from Twitter (X) now!
Publisher description, verbatimon X (Twitter), by users in the last 30 days among actors classified to this platform.
best #1 for “scraper tweets”
Fast, easy-to-use scraper with generally good support, but it suffers from unpredictable pricing, strict result limits, and frequent incomplete or incorrect result sets.
| Theme | Sentiment | Said | What they mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it costs | 0 praised · 17 complained | 17 | charges for no-result responses and demossudden large price increases“I'm already charged $3 for several "noResults" responses: [ { "noResults": true }, { "noResults": true }, { "noResults": true }, { "noResults": true }, { "noResults": true }, { "noResults": true }, { "noResults": true }, { "noResults": true }, { "noResults": true }, { "noResults": true } ]” — 1/5 |
| Does it return everything | 2 praised · 11 complained | 13 | successfully scrapes large numbers of tweetsoften returns few or empty result sets“set max results to 20, got a dataset with 1005 "results" and only 5 actual real results. Charged ~$0.40 for 1000 results. Stay away.” — 1/5 |
| Does it run | 5 praised · 9 complained | 14 | generally fast and works as expectedfilters and time-range often don't work“Hi Team, filtering tweets based on time is not working .. i tried the search terms ( since ) option and i used the query wizard start date and end date .. both giving results outside the executed time range in the request” — 4/5 |
| Caps and ceilings | 0 praised · 7 complained | 7 | rigid hard caps on results per runcannot retrieve single tweet or full requested counts“Good service. Question: If i want to scrape 100 X Accounts. Is there a way to scrape like max. 10 Posts per Account so that the requests leads to max 1000 ?” — 5/5 |
| Is the data right | 2 praised · 3 complained | 5 | clean data and generally satisfactory accuracyreported counts often mismatch actual results“gives only 16 results and shows 1005 results. all the others are undefined.” — 1/5 |
| What it supports | 0 praised · 3 complained | 3 | lacks filters for likes, bookmarks, and exclusions“Is there any way to exclude retweets, comments, and likes from bot accounts when downloading the data?” — 3/5 |
| Does the publisher answer | 4 praised · 2 complained | 6 | fast, responsive developer and email supportrequires account to access chat support“The scraper works exactly as described, support is available on discord and the developer has helped me with many questions. Been using it very reliably for a month now with over 200k+ requests.” — 5/5 |
| Setup and docs | 5 praised · 1 complained | 6 | very easy and smooth to useconfusing and awkward to get started“Very easy to use and surprisingly fast. Exactly what I needed” — 5/5 |
| How fast | 3 praised · 1 complained | 4 | fast, quick scraping and responsesoccasionally could be faster“Clean data. Quick results.” — 5/5 |
Follow this actor, compare it against its rivals, and get every overnight change in one morning report. Publish it yourself? Claim your publisher page and its full history is yours free, forever.
X (Twitter)