Actor/caprolok

Linkedin Employees Scraper

Effortlessly gather LinkedIn URLs and names of employees in bulk. Ideal for HR and recruitment, this tool quickly provides essential contact information, simplifying talent search and networking opportunities.

Publisher description, verbatim
Last 7 dayson this actor
Each one reaches followers by email the morning after.Follow this actor
Key figures30 readings
Price / 1k$20.00per 1,000 data_request
Users / 30d55↓ 10 over 30 readings
Users, all time4,081↑ 69 over 30 readings
Runs / 30d970↓ 2,421 over 30 readings
Runs / user / mo17.6runs per monthly user
Users / 30d30 readings
08-10↓ 1009-08
Standing
#129of 1,395

on LinkedIn, by users in the last 30 days among actors classified to this platform.

Store search presence
3top-10 keywords

best #4 for “employees”

  • employees#4
  • employees scraper#4
  • platform costs#9
re-crawled daily

What the reviews say

Fast and often accurate at finding company employees, but frequently fails to run or filter correctly, is expensive, limited in results, and has poor support.

16 of 23 reviews carry text
ThemeSentimentSaidWhat they mean
Does it run0 praised · 8 complained8frequently fails to run or executereturns random or unusable results“rien ne fonctionne les adresses linkedin pourtant existantes, sont refusées” — 1/5
Is the data right2 praised · 3 complained5accurate at finding company employeesreturns people from wrong companies“I'm searching a LinkedIn page and receive 20 people from different companies. What's up ??” — 1/5
What it costs0 praised · 3 complained3extremely expensive; users request refunds“I should get a refund it didn't even work” — 1/5
Caps and ceilings0 praised · 2 complained2limited to ten results per companyaccepts only one company per run“For finding company employee you need these settings: 1- Full url (Ex: with the trailing / at the end and the www. 2- You use only 1 company per run. 3- You use the Residential Proxy. With that, I get very good result. You can spin a script in python to multithread multiple run and process your result easily.” — 5/5
Setup and docs0 praised · 1 complained1requires exact full URL with trailing slash
Does the publisher answer0 praised · 1 complained1no customer support available“Doesnt work and no support” — 1/5
What it supports0 praised · 1 complained1rejects LinkedIn addresses or URLs
How fast1 praised · 0 complained1fast performance with quick results“Actor is accurate and fast” — 5/5

Does it run

0 ↑ · 8 ↓ of 8
frequently fails to run or executereturns random or unusable results“rien ne fonctionne les adresses linkedin pourtant existantes, sont refusées” — 1/5

Is the data right

2 ↑ · 3 ↓ of 5
accurate at finding company employeesreturns people from wrong companies“I'm searching a LinkedIn page and receive 20 people from different companies. What's up ??” — 1/5

What it costs

0 ↑ · 3 ↓ of 3
extremely expensive; users request refunds“I should get a refund it didn't even work” — 1/5

Caps and ceilings

0 ↑ · 2 ↓ of 2
limited to ten results per companyaccepts only one company per run“For finding company employee you need these settings: 1- Full url (Ex: with the trailing / at the end and the www. 2- You use only 1 company per run. 3- You use the Residential Proxy. With that, I get very good result. You can spin a script in python to multithread multiple run and process your result easily.” — 5/5
4 more themes · read all 16
Every count is a review we read. 1 of the 16 said only that they liked it, with nothing specific — those are excluded from the themes above. Quotes are one reviewer, unedited.Read all 16 →

Recorded changes

0 in the last 30 days · followers get the next one by email

No price, README, schema or grade changes were recorded in this window.

Follow this actor, compare it against its rivals, and get every overnight change in one morning report. Publish it yourself? Claim your publisher page and its full history is yours free, forever.

Open in the app Publish this actor? Claim the page

Numbers on this page are measured only by an independent census of the Apify Store — not self-reported.