What the reviews say
Fast and often accurate at finding company employees, but frequently fails to run or filter correctly, is expensive, limited in results, and has poor support.
| Theme | Sentiment | Said | What they mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does it run | 0 praised · 8 complained | 8 | frequently fails to run or executereturns random or unusable results“rien ne fonctionne les adresses linkedin pourtant existantes, sont refusées” — 1/5 |
| Is the data right | 2 praised · 3 complained | 5 | accurate at finding company employeesreturns people from wrong companies“I'm searching a LinkedIn page and receive 20 people from different companies. What's up ??” — 1/5 |
| What it costs | 0 praised · 3 complained | 3 | extremely expensive; users request refunds“I should get a refund it didn't even work” — 1/5 |
| Caps and ceilings | 0 praised · 2 complained | 2 | limited to ten results per companyaccepts only one company per run“For finding company employee you need these settings: 1- Full url (Ex: with the trailing / at the end and the www. 2- You use only 1 company per run. 3- You use the Residential Proxy. With that, I get very good result. You can spin a script in python to multithread multiple run and process your result easily.” — 5/5 |
| Setup and docs | 0 praised · 1 complained | 1 | requires exact full URL with trailing slash |
| Does the publisher answer | 0 praised · 1 complained | 1 | no customer support available“Doesnt work and no support” — 1/5 |
| What it supports | 0 praised · 1 complained | 1 | rejects LinkedIn addresses or URLs |
| How fast | 1 praised · 0 complained | 1 | fast performance with quick results“Actor is accurate and fast” — 5/5 |
Is the data right
2 ↑ · 3 ↓ of 5What it costs
0 ↑ · 3 ↓ of 3Caps and ceilings
0 ↑ · 2 ↓ of 2History
30 readings since 2026-09-25Alternatives on LinkedIn
The actors either side of #211 of 1,727, ranked by users in the last 30 days. Same platform, adjacent adoption — the comparable set.
| # | Actor | Grade | Price / 1k | Users /30d | Success | Rating | Age | Fresh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 206 | B | EVT$2.00 /1k api-requestgood price | 53125 total | 98.5% | — | 3m | fresh | ||
| 207 | B | RES$7.00 /1kfair price | 53337 total | 93.7% | 5.0 | 10m | fresh | ||
| 208 | C | EVT$20.00 /1k per-resulthigh price | 531,846 total | 99.8% | 3.0 | 2.3y | aging | ||
| 209 | C | RES$2.50 /1kgood price | 52142 total | 87.9% | 5.0 | 3m | fresh | ||
| 210 | B | EVT$2.40 /1k jobfair price | 5056 total | 100.0% | 5.0 | 21d | fresh | ||
| 211 | D | EVT$20.00 /1k data_requesthigh price | 504,175 total | 96.0% | 1.0 | 2.8y | fresh | This | |
| 212 | C | EVT$0.80 /1k job-resultgood price | 50574 total | 90.4% | 5.0 | 4m | aging | ||
| 213 | B | EVT$5.00 /1k jobfair price | 50356 total | 99.2% | 5.0 | 4m | fresh | ||
| 214 | C | RES$18.00 /1ksteep price | 495,375 total | 96.8% | 4.8 | 4.7y | aging | ||
| 215 | C | RES$2.00 /1kgood price | 49102 total | 100.0% | 5.0 | 5m | aging | ||
| 216 | C | RES$10.00 /1khigh price | 49113 total | 98.1% | 5.0 | 5m | aging |