What the reviews say
Fast, complete, and generally reliable with helpful support and easy setup, but it can consume excessive credits, sometimes scrape the wrong URL or behave unpredictably, and hits layer limits.
| Theme | Sentiment | Said | What they mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does it run | 5 praised · 3 complained | 8 | fewer blocks during scrapingruns without being triggered“I am using this actor for my monthly and adhoc tasks. I am getting 1-1.5M posts/comments information every month (date, text, reddit score, post type etc) and it works really fast with very less blocks. And developer answers your problems and solve them really quick. Definitely suggested for your reddit tasks.” — 5/5 |
| What it costs | 0 praised · 2 complained | 2 | consumes excessive credits per scrape“This actor is a scam and keeps running without me triggering it and wasting me credit limit” — 1/5 |
| Is the data right | 1 praised · 1 complained | 2 | accurately extracts expected resultssometimes scrapes incorrect URLs“Very good. It's always worked so far and extracted the correct results. Thanks.” — 5/5 |
| Does it return everything | 5 praised · 0 complained | 5 | extracts full threads including metadatareturns all desired fields“I tried other Reddit scrapers, but the ones i tried couldn't get past 10 layers deep in the comments. This scraper had no issue simply extracting all the comments in the thread. Very helpful.” — 5/5 |
| How fast | 3 praised · 0 complained | 3 | consistently fast scraping performance“Works much faster and more reliably than other options I've tried.” — 5/5 |
| Does the publisher answer | 2 praised · 0 complained | 2 | responsive, helpful maintainer responsesdevelopers respond quickly to issues“Great rapid process and maintainers are very helpful.” — 5/5 |
| Caps and ceilings | 1 praised · 0 complained | 1 | stops after about ten layers |
| Setup and docs | 1 praised · 0 complained | 1 | simple and easy to use“Easy to use and the results were complete.” — 5/5 |
| What it supports | 1 praised · 0 complained | 1 | timeframe filter optimizes coverage“Finally a reddit scraper that gives me exactly what I want. The timeframe filter and maximize coverage were a godsend. Many thanks.” — 5/5 |
What it costs
0 ↑ · 2 ↓ of 2Is the data right
1 ↑ · 1 ↓ of 2Does it return everything
5 ↑ · 0 ↓ of 5History
30 readings since 2026-09-25Alternatives on Reddit
The actors either side of #3 of 743, ranked by users in the last 30 days. Same platform, adjacent adoption — the comparable set.
| # | Actor | Grade | Price / 1k | Users /30d | Success | Rating | Age | Fresh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | B | RES$4.00 /1k | 8,46349.7K total | 87.0% | 4.4 | 6.3y | fresh | ||
| 2 | A | RES$2.00 /1k | 4,46817.7K total | 97.8% | 4.7 | 16m | fresh | ||
| 3 | B | RES$1.49 /1k | 3,38065.6K total | 97.5% | 4.1 | 15m | fresh | This | |
| 4 | B | EVT$1.15 /1k post | 1,2375,667 total | 99.8% | 4.7 | 9m | fresh | ||
| 5 | B | EVT$2.99 /1k post-scraped | 1,0152,445 total | 98.7% | — | 7m | fresh | ||
| 6 | B | EVT$0.99 /1k result-scraped | 5481,543 total | 99.8% | 1.0 | 7m | fresh | ||
| 7 | B | RES$1.50 /1k | 4583,772 total | 98.5% | 4.9 | 2.2y | fresh | ||
| 8 | B | EVT$1.99 /1k post-scraped | 4471,226 total | 97.7% | — | 7m | fresh |