What the reviews say
Good at producing fast, reliable, ready-to-import username/ID outputs with clean, consistent columns, but it can omit some profile fields and occasionally slow down or fail on larger accounts.
| Theme | Sentiment | Said | What they mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does it return everything | 16 praised · 4 complained | 20 | complete follower records with usernames and user IDsconsistent, ready-to-use columns and fields“I tested it on a couple of different public accounts to compare results. Each time, the scraper delivered consistent and complete data sets. It’s straightforward to use and doesn’t require any complicated setup, which I really appreciate.” — 5/5 |
| How fast | 5 praised · 3 complained | 8 | fast runs for small-to-medium accountsslower performance with larger accounts“I used it to quickly check the followers of a competitor’s account, and it gave me a clear overview in one run. What I liked most was how hands-off it felt—I just started it and let it do its thing. Came back a few minutes later and everything was” — 5/5 |
| Does it run | 20 praised · 1 complained | 21 | stable server-side runs with auto-savesome runs failed or didn’t work“I used it to scrape a niche influencer’s followers for outreach, and it handled the job really well. The tool didn’t lag even with a few thousand entries loading in. Having all the data ready in JSON made it easy to plug into my workflow.” — 5/5 |
| What it supports | 5 praised · 1 complained | 6 | includes user IDs and verification statuslacks follower bios and account categories“At first, I was unsure since it doesn’t require login, but it actually worked really well. I tested it on a business page and the data came back accurate, including usernames and verification status. The whole process felt quick and hassle-free.” — 5/5 |
| Setup and docs | 22 praised · 0 complained | 22 | plug-and-play, no login requiredclean CSV/JSON ready for direct import“The tool is pretty straightforward and doesn’t take long to figure out. Scraping speed is decent, but it can slow down a bit with larger accounts. The export feature works well, but I had to clean up the data slightly before using it.” — 5/5 |
| Is the data right | 2 praised · 0 complained | 2 | mostly accurate follower data outputs“I used it to scrape a mid-sized public account and it worked fine overall. The data was mostly accurate, though I noticed a few missing profiles here and there. Still, for a quick export, it gets the job done.” — 5/5 |
| Caps and ceilings | 1 praised · 0 complained | 1 | allows setting result limits per run“Straightforward. Didn't need to read any docs, just entered a username and set my limit. Had results in my dataset shortly after.” — 5/5 |
How fast
5 ↑ · 3 ↓ of 8Does it run
20 ↑ · 1 ↓ of 21What it supports
5 ↑ · 1 ↓ of 6History
30 readings since 2026-09-25Alternatives on Instagram
The actors either side of #233 of 1,729, ranked by users in the last 30 days. Same platform, adjacent adoption — the comparable set.
| # | Actor | Grade | Price / 1k | Users /30d | Success | Rating | Age | Fresh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 228 | B | EVT$2.00 /1k similar-profilegood price | 3559 total | 100.0% | — | 43d | fresh | ||
| 229 | C | EVT$400 /1k transcriptsteep price | 35388 total | 100.0% | 5.0 | 10m | aging | ||
| 230 | C | EVT$46.00 /1k youtube-transcripthigh price | 34235 total | 100.0% | — | 7m | aging | ||
| 231 | B | RES$2.50 /1kfair price | 33207 total | 100.0% | — | 5m | fresh | ||
| 232 | B | RES$2.50 /1kfair price | 33129 total | 100.0% | — | 5m | fresh | ||
| 233 | C | RES$3.80 /1ksteep price | 33984 total | 87.7% | 4.9 | 9m | aging | This | |
| 234 | C | RES$2.50 /1kfair price | 33539 total | 100.0% | 5.0 | 10m | aging | ||
| 235 | C | RES$1.50 /1kgood price | 3282 total | 75.4% | — | 3m | fresh | ||
| 236 | B | EVT$0.45 /1k itemgood price | 3295 total | 99.3% | 5.0 | 4m | fresh | ||
| 237 | B | EVT$9.99 /1k video-megabytefair price | 32104 total | 97.1% | — | 3m | fresh | ||
| 238 | B | RES$1.20 /1kgood price | 3285 total | 93.6% | — | 59d | fresh |