What the reviews say
Fast, accurate, complete scraping with predictable, low pricing and responsive support; it fails when you need large per-keyword volumes because there is a per-keyword result cap.
| Theme | Sentiment | Said | What they mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caps and ceilings | 0 praised · 1 complained | 1 | per-keyword result cap limits large pulls“Solid and cheap. Posts mode with a date window (postedAfter/postedBefore) pulled exactly the quarter I needed from 12 creator accounts, with likes, replies, reposts and media URLs. Search depth is limited to what Threads shows without login — the README explains why and the expansion option helps, but set expectations: it's hundreds per keyword, not thousands. Support answered my issue the same day” — 4/5 |
| What it costs | 6 praised · 0 complained | 6 | low and predictable per-request pricing“Great actor to retrieve threads fast and cheap!” — 5/5 |
| Does it return everything | 4 praised · 0 complained | 4 | rich post-level fields returnedreturns exact requested subsets“Clean, flat rows. Every post has url, numeric userId, isReply and replyToUserId, so rebuilding a conversation thread was one join. Pagination on a profile went through 1,400 posts without a hiccup. Errors come back as rows with a reason instead of the run just failing, which is what you want when it's wired into n8n” — 5/5 |
| Does it run | 3 praised · 0 complained | 3 | stable, no data mistakesclear error rows with reasons“Top, recent and tag pages in one pass, deduplicated. Running the same query twice gives me the same set plus what's new, not a different random sample each time” — 5/5 |
| How fast | 3 praised · 0 complained | 3 | fast runs, under a minutequick retrieval of threads“quick, reiable, no mistakes or issues” — 5/5 |
| Setup and docs | 3 praised · 0 complained | 3 | no login or cookies requiredclean flat CSV-like rows“Used Accounts mode with profile details for wedding photographer austin — got usernames, follower counts, bio links and the emails people put in their bios, in one run. Fed the websites into their contact scraper afterwards. No login, no cookies, so no risk to our own account, which is the reason we dropped the previous too” — 5/5 |
| Is the data right | 2 praised · 0 complained | 2 | numeric values match public UIgenerally free of obvious errors“works, no mistakes” — 5/5 |
| What it supports | 1 praised · 0 complained | 1 | aggregates top, recent, and tag pages |
| Does the publisher answer | 1 praised · 0 complained | 1 | responsive, same-day support responses |
What it costs
6 ↑ · 0 ↓ of 6Does it return everything
4 ↑ · 0 ↓ of 4Does it run
3 ↑ · 0 ↓ of 3History
17 readings since 2026-09-09Alternatives on Threads
The actors either side of #21 of 236, ranked by users in the last 30 days. Same platform, adjacent adoption — the comparable set.
| # | Actor | Grade | Price / 1k | Users /30d | Success | Rating | Age | Fresh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | B | RES$4.00 /1khigh price | 62191 total | 92.6% | 5.0 | 7m | fresh | ||
| 17 | B | RES$2.49 /1kfair price | 5490 total | 98.8% | 5.0 | 21d | fresh | ||
| 18 | B | EVT$5.00 /1k ad-row-basicsteep price | 53193 total | 99.4% | 5.0 | 5m | fresh | ||
| 19 | B | EVT$4.00 /1k ad-scrapedfair price | 49421 total | 97.3% | — | 6m | fresh | ||
| 20 | C | RES$2.00 /1kgood price | 49159 total | 88.5% | 5.0 | 7m | fresh | ||
| 21 | B | EVT$2.00 /1k postgood price | 4875 total | 99.1% | 4.9 | 19d | fresh | This | |
| 22 | C | EVT$3.00 /1k post-resultfair price | 48117 total | 66.3% | 5.0 | 48d | fresh | ||
| 23 | B | EVT$4.00 /1k post-resultfair price | 3990 total | 92.9% | 5.0 | 2m | fresh | ||
| 24 | C | RES$4.00 /1khigh price | 34362 total | 98.5% | 1.7 | 7m | fresh | ||
| 25 | B | EVT$1.00 /1k profile-scrapedgood price | 28208 total | 97.8% | — | 5m | fresh | ||
| 26 | C | RES$0.50 /1kgood price | 25127 total | 99.6% | — | 3m | aging |