olympus
🟢 Leads Finder -$1/1k leads [like apollo, linkedIn
LinkedInDoes it return everything
1 ↑ · 6 ↓ of 7high quality lead datalimited number of records returned“This works, but did not get personal phone numbers. got only organization numbers. Any fix available?” — 4/5
What the reviews say
Fast and accurate at producing high-quality leads (especially from Apollo sources), but it suffers from limited records per run, inconsistent reliability, poor contact enrichment, and sparse documentation/pricing clarity.
| Theme | Sentiment | Said | What they mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does it return everything | 1 praised · 6 complained | 7 | high quality lead datalimited number of records returned“This works, but did not get personal phone numbers. got only organization numbers. Any fix available?” — 4/5 |
| Caps and ceilings | 0 praised · 6 complained | 6 | very small free-run quota“Free only 100 so how can i conform is it okay or not? Please increase your free plan.” — 1/5 |
| Does it run | 1 praised · 3 complained | 4 | typically runs smoothly on successfrequent failures; often fails to fetch data“Offen not fetching data” — 2/5 |
| Is the data right | 6 praised · 2 complained | 8 | accurate, fresh leads matching sourcemany collected emails are invalid“really nice. reasonably fast and accurate- i haven't found anything else that works this well on apollo search urls.” — 5/5 |
| What it supports | 2 praised · 1 complained | 3 | directly pulls from Apollo search URLsinconsistent or failing with Apollo inputs“This guy is the main deal. Direct from the source apollo. You wont regret it” — 5/5 |
| Does the publisher answer | 2 praised · 1 complained | 3 | responsive, communicative developer supportdevelopers reply but do not fix issues“Great actor. Good communication too if you running into any issues. Glad to be here” — 5/5 |
| Setup and docs | 1 praised · 1 complained | 2 | easy setup and straightforward usageinsufficient tutorial or step-by-step guide“Works great, easy setup. Thank you!” — 5/5 |
| What it costs | 0 praised · 1 complained | 1 | per-run charging makes frequent use costly“I have raised multiple support tickets regarding a recurring issue with Apollo links, and the experience has been a total waste of time and money. Despite the developer replying, no actual fix has been provided. The developer has made empty promises, claiming the issue is 'fixed' while the backend is clearly down or broken. I have been asked to re-run the same links over 6 times to 'test' their supposed fixes, with each run costing me money. While the individual cost is small, it adds up quickly when the actor fails every single time. I provided the exact Apollo links in the support chat and requested the developer test them before asking me to spend more credits. They refused to take accountability and instead claimed the links were 'broken,' even though they work perfectly on other platforms. This feels like a scam to get users to pay for failed runs while the developer avoids doing their own testing. Save your credits and avoid this actor.” — 1/5 |
| How fast | 2 praised · 0 complained | 2 | very fast, efficient scraping performance“Very fast and as for quality, its the best so far on apify.” — 5/5 |
Caps and ceilings
0 ↑ · 6 ↓ of 6very small free-run quota“Free only 100 so how can i conform is it okay or not? Please increase your free plan.” — 1/5
Does it run
1 ↑ · 3 ↓ of 4typically runs smoothly on successfrequent failures; often fails to fetch data“Offen not fetching data” — 2/5
Is the data right
6 ↑ · 2 ↓ of 8accurate, fresh leads matching sourcemany collected emails are invalid“really nice. reasonably fast and accurate- i haven't found anything else that works this well on apollo search urls.” — 5/5
Every count is a review we read.
16 of the 46 said only that they liked it, with nothing specific — those are excluded from the themes above.
Quotes are one reviewer, unedited.Read all 46 →
Recorded changes
showing 3 of 20 in the last 30 days · followers get all 20 by email- 2026-09-05qualityQuality grade changedB → C—on record
- 2026-09-05searchKeyword rank moveleft top-10 for “finder” (#10 → #11)—on record
- 2026-09-01searchKeyword rank moveleft top-3 for “finder leads” (#3 → #4)—on record