Leads Scraper ✅ With EMAILS ✅ like Apollo | LinkedIn Profile
✅ ISSUES FIXED ✅ | $100 for 100k |Extract leads with verified ☎️ Phone 💌 Work & Personal Emails - Similar to Apollo, ZoomInfo, Lusha, LinkedIn
Publisher description, verbatim
Standing
#112of 1,395
on LinkedIn, by users in the last 30 days among actors classified to this platform.
What the reviews say
Fast, smooth scraper that can deliver affordable, fresh leads, but it fails on data accuracy (many invalid or non-existent emails), lacks filters, has poor support and reliability, and now feels limited after a price increase.
23 of 47 reviews carry text
| Theme | Sentiment | Said | What they mean |
| Is the data right | 2 praised · 6 complained | 8 | affordable, good-quality business leadsdata appears fresh and up-to-date“The underlying data appears to be very outdated, as the proportion of invalid emails is around 70%. Support appears to be aware of the problem but does not offer a remedy for current clients who have received useless data.” — 1/5 |
|---|
| Setup and docs | 0 praised · 3 complained | 3 | no keyword or industry filters available“Without having option of keyword , this is not very effective. if i want to find companies for my niche, there is nothing to write any keywords like fashion. ebike or whatever .... so add that feature” — 1/5 |
|---|
| What it costs | 1 praised · 2 complained | 3 | affordable pricing for lead qualityrecent price hike to about $100“Used to be good, now data is terrible, and raised price from 30 to a 100USD. Do not recommend.” — 2/5 |
|---|
| Does the publisher answer | 0 praised · 2 complained | 2 | support doesn't resolve issues or explain deletions“I strongly advise against using this actor. I ran multiple batches of 1,000+ leads and over 90% of the emails were invalid or bounced, I also used the best mail verifier. The data was consistently inaccurate, many leads were clearly fake or mismatched. I opened several issues and was told each time that the problem had been fixed, but nothing actually changed. Every new run produced the same bad results and spent my money. My final open issue was deleted without explanation, and no real resolution was provided. After multiple attempts, wasted credits, and zero usable leads, I can confidently say this actor is unreliable and not worth using.” — 1/5 |
|---|
| Does it run | 0 praised · 2 complained | 2 | repeated runs produce the same poor results“not working for me” — 1/5 |
|---|
| Does it return everything | 0 praised · 1 complained | 1 | many leads lack email addresses“About a half of the leads are with no emails (even if you click on verified only and leads with emails) and half of those with emails are actually healthy (with good emails, not risky). So from 2K leads you get 500 which are actually ok to send them email to. Also I was unable to get more than 2K leads from my filters, even though it says there is 100K+ leads like that (on your site So I don't know, it seems kinda expensive for what you actually get, or?” — 3/5 |
|---|
| Caps and ceilings | 0 praised · 1 complained | 1 | hard cap around 2,000 leads |
|---|
| How fast | 1 praised · 0 complained | 1 | fast and smooth scraping performance“amazing scraper. Fast and smooth” — 5/5 |
Is the data right
2 ↑ · 6 ↓ of 8affordable, good-quality business leadsdata appears fresh and up-to-date“The underlying data appears to be very outdated, as the proportion of invalid emails is around 70%. Support appears to be aware of the problem but does not offer a remedy for current clients who have received useless data.” — 1/5
Setup and docs
0 ↑ · 3 ↓ of 3no keyword or industry filters available“Without having option of keyword , this is not very effective. if i want to find companies for my niche, there is nothing to write any keywords like fashion. ebike or whatever .... so add that feature” — 1/5
What it costs
1 ↑ · 2 ↓ of 3affordable pricing for lead qualityrecent price hike to about $100“Used to be good, now data is terrible, and raised price from 30 to a 100USD. Do not recommend.” — 2/5
Does the publisher answer
0 ↑ · 2 ↓ of 2support doesn't resolve issues or explain deletions“I strongly advise against using this actor. I ran multiple batches of 1,000+ leads and over 90% of the emails were invalid or bounced, I also used the best mail verifier. The data was consistently inaccurate, many leads were clearly fake or mismatched. I opened several issues and was told each time that the problem had been fixed, but nothing actually changed. Every new run produced the same bad results and spent my money. My final open issue was deleted without explanation, and no real resolution was provided. After multiple attempts, wasted credits, and zero usable leads, I can confidently say this actor is unreliable and not worth using.” — 1/5
4 more themes · read all 23 →
Every count is a review we read.
10 of the 23 said only that they liked it, with nothing specific — those are excluded from the themes above.
Quotes are one reviewer, unedited.Read all 23 →
Recorded changes
showing 3 of 5 in the last 30 days · followers get all 5 by email
- 2026-09-08schemaInput schema changed—on record
- 2026-09-08contentREADME updated-569 characters-569characters
- 2026-09-08contentDescription changed—on record
Follow this actor, compare it against its rivals, and get
every overnight change in one morning report.
Publish it yourself? Claim your publisher page and its full history is
yours free, forever.
Open in the app
Publish this actor? Claim the page
Numbers on this page are measured only by an independent census of the Apify Store — not self-reported.