What the reviews say
The scraper is fast, easy to use, and reliably integrates with Make.com while providing accurate metadata, but it misses key data (transcripts, likes/views), delivers low‑res thumbnails, has limited channel coverage and filtering, and suffers from unresponsive support.
| Theme | Sentiment | Said | What they mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does it return everything | 0 praised · 2 complained | 2 | no video transcriptions availablemissing likes and views counts“I like it, it got everything i needed from the channel, but i was expecting the transcription of the videos. Either way, i like the tool man.” — 5/5 |
| Is the data right | 1 praised · 1 complained | 2 | returns accurate video metadatavery low-resolution video thumbnails“I got accurate results. I recommend it to everyone!” — 5/5 |
| Does the publisher answer | 0 praised · 1 complained | 1 | support team becomes unresponsive“Video thumbnails are very low resolution and blocky looking. Found a bug in search results and opened a ticket but they stopped responding.” — 3/5 |
| What it supports | 0 praised · 1 complained | 1 | poor channel-level data coverage“not good for channels” — 3/5 |
| Caps and ceilings | 0 praised · 1 complained | 1 | cannot filter by title or keyword“It would be great to add a filter by title or keyword within the title. This would allow extracting videos based on specific titles or keywords.” — 3/5 |
| How fast | 2 praised · 0 complained | 2 | fast data retrieval from channels“I like how fast it grabs info from channels” — 5/5 |
| Setup and docs | 2 praised · 0 complained | 2 | simple to use and implement“What a fantastic tool! So simple and easy. Maximum ease of use. Love this” — 5/5 |
| Does it run | 1 praised · 0 complained | 1 | reliable integration with make.com“Does what it says. Works like a charm with make.com integrations.” — 5/5 |
Is the data right
1 ↑ · 1 ↓ of 2Does the publisher answer
0 ↑ · 1 ↓ of 1What it supports
0 ↑ · 1 ↓ of 1History
30 readings since 2026-09-25Alternatives on YouTube
The actors either side of #5 of 2,331, ranked by users in the last 30 days. Same platform, adjacent adoption — the comparable set.
| # | Actor | Grade | Price / 1k | Users /30d | Success | Rating | Age | Fresh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A | RES$4.00 /1kfair price | 15,020177.3K total | 99.1% | 4.8 | 3.3y | fresh | ||
| 2 | B | RES$5.00 /1khigh price | 3,90314.4K total | 99.9% | 5.0 | 14m | stale | ||
| 3 | A | EVT$2.75 /1k videoprocessed | 3,7607,377 total | 99.9% | 4.8 | 11m | fresh | ||
| 4 | A | RES$2.00 /1kfair price | 3,32527.3K total | 98.5% | 4.9 | 3.3y | fresh | ||
| 5 | A | RES$1.30 /1kgood price | 3,17026.8K total | 98.3% | 4.7 | 3.2y | fresh | This | |
| 6 | C | RES$10.00 /1ksteep price | 2,56626.5K total | 81.9% | 3.7 | 23m | fresh | ||
| 7 | B | RES$4.00 /1kfair price | 2,26469.7K total | 99.5% | 4.4 | 3.6y | fresh | ||
| 8 | B | RES$1.00 /1kgood price | 1,5236,592 total | 100.0% | — | 9m | fresh | ||
| 9 | B | EVT$6.00 /1k downloadMb | 1,35826.6K total | 94.0% | 4.3 | 21m | fresh | ||
| 10 | B | EVT$2.00 /1k ad | 1,2612,528 total | 99.7% | 5.0 | 4m | fresh |