What the reviews say
The scraper delivers fast, reliable, cleanly structured results with easy, no-login use and low cost, but it fails on completeness and some accuracy fields (mixed job types, wrong dates), has a broken easy-apply field, and recently increased its price.
| Theme | Sentiment | Said | What they mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does it return everything | 0 praised · 4 complained | 4 | missing job type and category informationno experience-level or filtering options“Your job tool is great. Can you please add the flexibility of choosing the experience level. Like if I just want to choose entry level and mid senior or just director and mid senior etc” — 5/5 |
| Is the data right | 1 praised · 2 complained | 3 | clean, structured output suitable for parsingreturns broad, mixed job types“The worldunboxer/rapid-linkedin-scraper has a fundamental problem — it doesn't filter by job function/category. Even with "Java Spring Boot Backend Engineer" as the query, LinkedIn's public search returns a broad mix of all job types. This actor scrapes whatever LinkedIn returns without role-type filtering.” — 1/5 |
| Does it run | 3 praised · 1 complained | 4 | stable performance and handles large scrapesintegrates well with MCP tooling“Really great scaping tool 🔥. Better than other scrapers on apify. I tried scraping 5000 jobs and it did smoothly. Also it was faster than expected.” — 5/5 |
| What it costs | 2 praised · 1 complained | 3 | free and highly cost-effective for usersrecent notable price increase reported“This actor is very efficient and cost effective.” — 5/5 |
| How fast | 5 praised · 0 complained | 5 | fast scraping and quick job searchesconsistently faster than expected in tests“Tried a few LinkedIn scrapers, and this one just works. Fast, reliable, and works great 👍 with MCP tools.” — 5/5 |
| Setup and docs | 1 praised · 0 complained | 1 | no login or cookies required“I tried the Rapid LinkedIn Jobs Scraper while working on a small job-market research project, and it turned out to be genuinely useful. What I liked most is that it works without login or cookies — I didn’t have to deal with LinkedIn restrictions or account issues. The scraping speed is fast, and it pulled the main details I needed, like job title, company name, location, and salary (when available). The data comes out clean and structured, which saved me a lot of time compared to manual scraping. It’s not perfect — some listings don’t include salary info, (maybe LinkedIn didn't provided in the description) and filtering options could be better — but for a free-to-try tool, it does the job surprisingly well. Overall, it’s a solid option if you need LinkedIn job data quickly without complicated setup.” — 5/5 |
Is the data right
1 ↑ · 2 ↓ of 3Does it run
3 ↑ · 1 ↓ of 4What it costs
2 ↑ · 1 ↓ of 3History
30 readings since 2026-09-25Alternatives on LinkedIn
The actors either side of #35 of 1,727, ranked by users in the last 30 days. Same platform, adjacent adoption — the comparable set.
| # | Actor | Grade | Price / 1k | Users /30d | Success | Rating | Age | Fresh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | B | EVT$5.00 /1k profilefair price | 7219,186 total | 98.5% | 4.9 | 21m | aging | ||
| 31 | B | EVT$100 /1k apify-actor-startsteep price | 71517.5K total | 99.3% | 4.0 | 13m | fresh | ||
| 32 | B | RES$5.00 /1k | 6426,008 total | 100.0% | 5.0 | 19m | aging | ||
| 33 | B | RES$2.00 /1k | 6341,966 total | 99.9% | 4.8 | 15m | fresh | ||
| 34 | B | EVT$2.00 /1k lead-returnedgood price | 6124,797 total | 99.7% | 3.9 | 7m | fresh | ||
| 35 | B | EVT$0.10 /1k job-quickgood price | 57815.7K total | 99.0% | 3.9 | 21m | fresh | This | |
| 36 | B | EVT$6.00 /1k profile-foundhigh price | 5522,966 total | 97.0% | 5.0 | 3m | fresh | ||
| 37 | C | RES$5.00 /1k | 5435,915 total | 100.0% | 3.7 | 23m | aging | ||
| 38 | B | RES$5.00 /1k | 53812.1K total | 100.0% | 4.4 | 22m | fresh | ||
| 39 | D | FREEfree | 5113,050 total | 21.7% | 4.7 | 3.4y | fresh | ||
| 40 | C | EVT$3.00 /1k profilefair price | 50916.0K total | 98.7% | 3.3 | 3.3y | fresh |