Each one reaches followers by email the morning after.Follow this actor
Key figures30 readings
Price / 1k$2.00per 1,000 lead-fetched
Users / 30d2,417↓ 471 over 30 readings
Users, all time46,762↑ 2,137 over 30 readings
Runs / 30d137.9k↓ 5,945 over 30 readings
Runs / user / mo57.0runs per monthly user
Users / 30d30 readings
Standing
#13of 1,395
on LinkedIn, by users in the last 30 days among actors classified to this platform.
Store search presence
16top-10 keywords
best #1 for “alternative”
alternative#1
apollo#1
apollo alternative#1
13 more#2–#10
re-crawled daily
What the reviews say
Fast, easy, and affordable with generally good lead enrichment, but it frequently fails or times out and returns incomplete, outdated, or duplicate results while having billing, limit, and support inconsistencies.
278 of 548 reviews carry text
Theme
Sentiment
Said
What they mean
Does it run
10 praised · 39 complained
49
consistently reliable and fast runsfrequent run failures, timeouts, incorrect filtering“Does not work. Looks like the creator has just added some random data in the db and is fetching results from there without considering the filters given by the user. I'd be happy to see this work and I had high hopes but I've been let down.” — 1/5
Is the data right
16 praised · 21 complained
37
high-quality, relevant leads and numbersstale or low-quality leads with duplicates“Actually, the quality seems good at first but when I thoroughly look into each data, many of the fields are missing and even I selected Email verified option, there are more than 60 percent of email missing leads.
Totally useless.” — 1/5
Does it return everything
2 praised · 21 complained
23
returns many important contact fieldsmissing phone numbers and emails“I have uploaded 1800+ companies to extract email data for specific titles out of which i got only 670 email from the uploaded companies to your platform and others pulled random companies i never included and changed me $4 it says $1.5/1k leads also last refund not received yet.” — 1/5
What it costs
12 praised · 12 complained
24
affordable, good value for costunexpected or incorrect per-run billing“Scraped 8k leads for a niche B2B SaaS campaign. The LinkedIn URL enrichment saved me a lot of manual work. Totally worth the Apify subscription just for this actor.” — 5/5
Caps and ceilings
0 praised · 12 complained
12
strict per-search lead limits and caps“As a fellow competitor I must say the speed is unmatched, I would only like to see a estimate on leads count to be fetched before the run in future updates. One of the best, keep it up.” — 5/5
What it supports
5 praised · 11 complained
16
enriches leads with emails, phones, LinkedInreturns leads from wrong countries“It work but all the companies are located in US and the phone number too , even if we exclude United states , the result is still the same , the majority in US” — 1/5
Does the publisher answer
3 praised · 3 complained
6
responsive developer support and quick fixesslow or missing formal customer support“The 1-Star reviews this actor is getting is stupid. CodeCrafter/Code Pioneer was very fast to act and create an alternative for us when Apify took all the apollo actors. Of course it will take him time to perfect the latest one. This was live 2-3 days ago and it was as good (if not better) than the old one. Patience while he do his thing. Thank you CodeCrafter for this awesome tool!” — 5/5
Setup and docs
13 praised · 1 complained
14
very easy, simple to use and integraterequires some initial learning curve“We used this actor to build multiple campaigns across different niches. Filters work well, and the data is reliable enough to plug straight into our outreach. Thanks for the tool.” — 5/5
How fast
11 praised · 0 complained
11
very fast data retrieval and processing“It looks quite promising. I ran a few searches and found good leads. Quite flexible and efficient. I am still testing it but so far I like the output. Results seem to be little less than I expected, but I am still tweaking and finding my way around this scraper. Looking forward to further improvements.” — 4/5
Does it run
10 ↑ · 39 ↓ of 49
consistently reliable and fast runsfrequent run failures, timeouts, incorrect filtering“Does not work. Looks like the creator has just added some random data in the db and is fetching results from there without considering the filters given by the user. I'd be happy to see this work and I had high hopes but I've been let down.” — 1/5
Is the data right
16 ↑ · 21 ↓ of 37
high-quality, relevant leads and numbersstale or low-quality leads with duplicates“Actually, the quality seems good at first but when I thoroughly look into each data, many of the fields are missing and even I selected Email verified option, there are more than 60 percent of email missing leads.
Totally useless.” — 1/5
Does it return everything
2 ↑ · 21 ↓ of 23
returns many important contact fieldsmissing phone numbers and emails“I have uploaded 1800+ companies to extract email data for specific titles out of which i got only 670 email from the uploaded companies to your platform and others pulled random companies i never included and changed me $4 it says $1.5/1k leads also last refund not received yet.” — 1/5
What it costs
12 ↑ · 12 ↓ of 24
affordable, good value for costunexpected or incorrect per-run billing“Scraped 8k leads for a niche B2B SaaS campaign. The LinkedIn URL enrichment saved me a lot of manual work. Totally worth the Apify subscription just for this actor.” — 5/5
Every count is a review we read.
140 of the 278 said only that they liked it, with nothing specific — those are excluded from the themes above.
Quotes are one reviewer, unedited.Read all 278 →
Recorded changes
showing 3 of 17 in the last 30 days · followers get all 17 by email
2026-09-03reviewsNew reviews+1 (549 total)+1549 total
2026-09-02reviewsNew reviews+1 (548 total)+1548 total
2026-08-30changeOpen issues spiked99 → 101 open—on record
Follow this actor, compare it against its rivals, and get
every overnight change in one morning report.
Publish it yourself? Claim your publisher page and its full history is
yours free, forever.