What the reviews say
Fast, easy-to-use scraper that often returns rich contact data but fails unpredictably with missing or wrong results, filtering issues, billing surprises and strict result caps.
| Theme | Sentiment | Said | What they mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does it run | 10 praised · 38 complained | 48 | consistently fast and dependable runsfrequent failures and zero results“Does not work. Looks like the creator has just added some random data in the db and is fetching results from there without considering the filters given by the user. I'd be happy to see this work and I had high hopes but I've been let down.” — 1/5 |
| Is the data right | 16 praised · 24 complained | 40 | high quality relevant contact datamany invalid, outdated or irrelevant leads“Actually, the quality seems good at first but when I thoroughly look into each data, many of the fields are missing and even I selected Email verified option, there are more than 60 percent of email missing leads. Totally useless.” — 1/5 |
| Does it return everything | 2 praised · 21 complained | 23 | returns many important contact fieldsmissing phone numbers and other fields“Hi Developer/Seller, I tried to fetch 1 record for testing purpose under free plan. I did not get mobile of person. Which is most important for us, I am reluctant to buy paid plan.” — 3/5 |
| What it costs | 12 praised · 13 complained | 25 | low cost and good valueunexpected billing and inconsistent pricing“Ran a campaign of about 20k prospects, and I do notice that there's a increase level prospects that are no longer working or retired. The database seems to be outdated and not refreshed as often. Though it's much cheaper, not sure if it's worth the price versus accuracy.” — 1/5 |
| Caps and ceilings | 0 praised · 11 complained | 11 | strict per-run and account lead caps“As a fellow competitor I must say the speed is unmatched, I would only like to see a estimate on leads count to be fetched before the run in future updates. One of the best, keep it up.” — 5/5 |
| What it supports | 5 praised · 10 complained | 15 | fetches emails, phones and LinkedInoften returns US-only or wrong-country contacts“It work but all the companies are located in US and the phone number too , even if we exclude United states , the result is still the same , the majority in US” — 1/5 |
| Does the publisher answer | 3 praised · 4 complained | 7 | developer responds quickly and helpsowner or support often unresponsive“Terrible data, and the maker is too busy to answer any message the clown. people getting billed for this bullshit outdated list, and the filters sometimes dont even work, and the clown doesnt even fix it. Lame, only about 10-20% of the leads are valid, over 70% are guaranteed garbage, either invalid, or unrelated to the filters you add. I hope apify just issue some kind of penalty to guys like this.” — 1/5 |
| Setup and docs | 13 praised · 2 complained | 15 | simple to set up and uselacks documentation and has a learning curve“We used this actor to build multiple campaigns across different niches. Filters work well, and the data is reliable enough to plug straight into our outreach. Thanks for the tool.” — 5/5 |
| How fast | 11 praised · 0 complained | 11 | very fast extraction and huge time savings“It looks quite promising. I ran a few searches and found good leads. Quite flexible and efficient. I am still testing it but so far I like the output. Results seem to be little less than I expected, but I am still tweaking and finding my way around this scraper. Looking forward to further improvements.” — 4/5 |
Is the data right
16 ↑ · 24 ↓ of 40Does it return everything
2 ↑ · 21 ↓ of 23What it costs
12 ↑ · 13 ↓ of 25History
30 readings since 2026-09-25Alternatives on LinkedIn
The actors either side of #16 of 1,727, ranked by users in the last 30 days. Same platform, adjacent adoption — the comparable set.
| # | Actor | Grade | Price / 1k | Users /30d | Success | Rating | Age | Fresh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | B | RES$0.70 /1kgood price | 3,76853.1K total | 97.8% | 4.4 | 21m | fresh | ||
| 12 | B | RES$5.00 /1kgood price | 3,50625.5K total | 100.0% | 4.7 | 23m | aging | ||
| 13 | A | EVT$2.00 /1k post-commentgood price | 2,6929,815 total | 100.0% | 4.8 | 17m | fresh | ||
| 14 | B | EVT$4.00 /1k search-pagesteep price | 2,5409,869 total | 89.4% | 4.5 | 15m | fresh | ||
| 15 | B | EVT$2.00 /1k short-companygood price | 2,33211.5K total | 99.9% | 4.4 | 11m | fresh | ||
| 16 | C | EVT$2.00 /1k lead-fetchedgood price | 2,00649.3K total | 98.9% | 3.4 | 13m | aging | This | |
| 17 | C | RES$5.00 /1kgood price | 1,96116.4K total | 100.0% | 3.0 | 16m | fresh | ||
| 18 | B | RES$5.00 /1kgood price | 1,87823.5K total | 98.0% | 4.8 | 22m | aging | ||
| 19 | B | RES$5.00 /1kgood price | 1,76015.1K total | 100.0% | 4.7 | 18m | aging | ||
| 20 | C | EVT$2.00 /1k postgood price | 1,65917.4K total | 99.9% | 4.1 | 20m | aging | ||
| 21 | A | EVT$2.00 /1k post-reactiongood price | 1,3995,875 total | 99.9% | 5.0 | 17m | fresh |