LinkedIn Jobs Scraper | Remove Duplicate Jobs | Pay Per Result

LinkedIn Jobs Scraper | Remove Duplicate Jobs. The LinkedIn jobs scraper allows you to collect jobs in 2 ways: By providing one or more start URLs, or By entering multiple keywords, search queries. You can use either method individually or combine both.

Publisher description, verbatim
Last 7 dayson this actor
Each one reaches followers by email the morning after.Follow this actor
Key figures30 readings
Price / 1k$0.70per 1,000 results
Users / 30d3,768↓ 374 over 30 readings
Users, all time53,150↑ 3,204 over 30 readings
Runs / 30d68.5k↓ 811 over 30 readings
Runs / user / mo18.2runs per monthly user
Standing
#11of 1,727

on LinkedIn, by users in the last 30 days among actors classified to this platform.

Store search presence
13top-10 keywords

best #1 for “duplicate jobs”

  • duplicate jobs#1
  • linkedin job#3
  • linkedin job scraper#3
  • 10 more#4–#6
re-crawled daily
Recorded changes
  • 2026-10-20searchKeyword rank moveentered top-3 for “linkedin jobs” (#4 → #3)—on record
  • 2026-10-20searchKeyword rank moveentered top-3 for “linkedin job” (#4 → #3)—on record
  • 2026-10-13reviewsNew reviews+1 (42 total)+142 total
showing 3 of 16 in the last 30 days · followers get all 16 by email

What the reviews say

Good at ease of use and responsive support, but fails at reliable, accurate, and complete scraping (unstable logic, account blocking, inconsistent limits).

22 of 22 reviews carry text
ThemeSentimentSaidWhat they mean
Does it run0 praised · 2 complained2frequent changes to scraper logiccauses LinkedIn accounts to be blocked“Are you kidding me? Aren't you tired to change the logic of the scrapper every week? One week it scrapes jobs that strictly match job titles and give output of only 250 postings, another week it gives a lot of irrelevant job titles 5k+ results. It makes it completely unusable in pipeline, every scrape becomes a new story to clean it.” — 2/5
Does it return everything0 praised · 2 complained2returns far fewer results than expected“didn't work as expected. couldn't find more than 5% of the results from the given link.” — 1/5
Is the data right0 praised · 2 complained2returns irrelevant titles and wrong fields“work type in the table is bringing back the department instead of the work type of remote, hybrid or on-site” — 4/5
Caps and ceilings0 praised · 2 complained2scrape limits behave unpredictably“Works great! The only thing is that the max scrape can be a bit weird. But I was able to accommodate on my end. Loving this one!” — 5/5
Does the publisher answer2 praised · 0 complained2responsive, quick, and gracious support“I thought there was an issue with the scraper, but the developer showed me where to find the fix I was looking for in Apify's settings. He responded quickly and was very gracious in explaining how the scraper works. Top notch scraper and wonderful developer support. Highly recommend!” — 5/5
Setup and docs2 praised · 0 complained2simple, easy setup and usage“Great tool so far. Loved for its simplicity to use and pricing.” — 5/5
What it supports1 praised · 0 complained1“My daily driver. This is an amazing scraping solutions and yields the cleanest meta data tables for your search results. You see the company, company mission, job description, salary, and etc broken down cleanly. I highly recommend this LinkedIn Scraper.” — 5/5
What it costs1 praised · 0 complained1

Does it run

0 ↑ · 2 ↓ of 2
frequent changes to scraper logiccauses LinkedIn accounts to be blocked“Are you kidding me? Aren't you tired to change the logic of the scrapper every week? One week it scrapes jobs that strictly match job titles and give output of only 250 postings, another week it gives a lot of irrelevant job titles 5k+ results. It makes it completely unusable in pipeline, every scrape becomes a new story to clean it.” — 2/5

Does it return everything

0 ↑ · 2 ↓ of 2
returns far fewer results than expected“didn't work as expected. couldn't find more than 5% of the results from the given link.” — 1/5

Is the data right

0 ↑ · 2 ↓ of 2
returns irrelevant titles and wrong fields“work type in the table is bringing back the department instead of the work type of remote, hybrid or on-site” — 4/5

Caps and ceilings

0 ↑ · 2 ↓ of 2
scrape limits behave unpredictably“Works great! The only thing is that the max scrape can be a bit weird. But I was able to accommodate on my end. Loving this one!” — 5/5
4 more themes · read all 22 →
Every count is a review we read. 11 of the 22 said only that they liked it, with nothing specific — those are excluded from the themes above. Quotes are one reviewer, unedited.Read all 22 →

History

30 readings since 2026-09-25
Users / 30d30 readings
09-25↓ 37410-24
Users, all time30 readings
09-25↑ 3,20410-24
Runs / 30d30 readings
09-25↓ 81110-24
Standing30 readings
09-25↑ 210-24

Alternatives on LinkedIn

The actors either side of #11 of 1,727, ranked by users in the last 30 days. Same platform, adjacent adoption — the comparable set.

all 1,727 on LinkedIn →
Sort
#ActorGradePrice / 1kUsers /30dSuccessRatingAgeFresh
6ARES$4.00 /1khigh price7,02329.0K total100.0%4.5 (33)17mfresh
7ARES$0.40 /1kgood price6,39933.3K total98.6%4.7 (26)18mfresh
8BEVT$3.00 /1k short-profilehigh price5,57237.7K total99.4%4.0 (49)16mfresh
9ARES$1.50 /1kfair price5,45146.3K total99.1%4.5 (74)3.7yfresh
10AEVT$2.00 /1k postgood price5,19315.4K total100.0%5.0 (21)16mfresh
11BRES$0.70 /1kgood price3,76853.1K total97.8%4.4 (42)21mfreshThis
12BRES$5.00 /1ksteep price3,50625.5K total100.0%4.7 (62)23maging
13AEVT$2.00 /1k post-commentgood price2,6929,815 total100.0%4.8 (22)17mfresh
14BEVT$4.00 /1k search-pagesteep price2,5409,869 total89.4%4.5 (17)15mfresh
15BEVT$2.00 /1k short-companygood price2,33211.5K total99.9%4.4 (22)11mfresh
16CEVT$2.00 /1k lead-fetchedgood price2,00649.3K total98.9%3.4 (542)13maging

Follow this actor, compare it against its rivals, and get every overnight change in one morning report.

Publish it yourself? Claim your publisher page and its full history is yours free, forever.

Open in the app Claim this page

Numbers on this page are measured only by an independent census of the Apify Store — not self-reported.