What the reviews say
Good at speed, ease of integration, structured output and responsive support; it fails on data completeness, occasional incorrect results, intermittent reliability, limited bulk/coverage capabilities, and inconsistent pricing/crediting.
| Theme | Sentiment | Said | What they mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does it return everything | 1 praised · 6 complained | 7 | useful, ready-to-use data fieldsmissing emails in many results“it charged for credit even if there was no emails. tested with couple of test data which worked for one of other linked in profile with email scrapers. that one is down now, so tried this one but the results are not there and even then its charging for credits. it should at least do not charge for if the data is not found.” — 1/5 |
| What it costs | 4 praised · 2 complained | 6 | affordable compared to many alternativescharges credits even for empty results“THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THIS WAS VERY USEFUL WHEN ALL OTHER ACTORS COST SO MUCH. THANK YOU BOSS” — 5/5 |
| Is the data right | 1 praised · 2 complained | 3 | generally returns expected profilessometimes returns unrelated or incorrect profiles“sometimes returns skill section, sometimes not. for one user returned me about section that is not in profile. dont know from where parser took this info” — 3/5 |
| Caps and ceilings | 1 praised · 2 complained | 3 | supports pagination for result pagesbulk retrieval or bulk option missing“10x more expensive than other actors. It's also $50 / 1000, but you can't get anywhere close to 1000 without being rate limited.” — 2/5 |
| Does it run | 1 praised · 2 complained | 3 | fast and responsive when workingintermittent failures and unpredictable availability“This actor is running automatically for 200 runs how to stop this as the delete options is greyed out?” — 1/5 |
| What it supports | 1 praised · 1 complained | 2 | captures public LinkedIn postsfails to scrape certain website pages“Overall a solid option if your workflow depends on monitoring public LinkedIn posts for research or analysis.” — 4/5 |
| Setup and docs | 4 praised · 0 complained | 4 | structured integration-ready output for downstream processingno-cookie LinkedIn scraping simplifies integration“As a developer, I appreciate how easy this actor is to integrate into data pipelines. The response structure is clean, and the fields are useful enough to plug directly into dashboards or internal reporting tools.” — 5/5 |
| How fast | 4 praised · 0 complained | 4 | much faster than manual scrapingtypical runs complete within seconds“Our content team uses this to study what top creators and founders are posting about. It’s been a great way to collect ideas, track engagement patterns, and understand content trends without manually checking profiles.” — 5/5 |
| Does the publisher answer | 2 praised · 0 complained | 2 | very responsive support and quick fixesfast feature implementation on request“Works perfectly! The developer is incredibly responsive and added a feature request in under an hour. Thank you!” — 5/5 |
What it costs
4 ↑ · 2 ↓ of 6Is the data right
1 ↑ · 2 ↓ of 3Caps and ceilings
1 ↑ · 2 ↓ of 3Recorded changes
showing 3 of 9 in the last 30 days · followers get all 9 by email- 2026-09-08searchKeyword rank moveentered top-3 for “their” (#4 → #2)—on record
- 2026-09-07searchKeyword rank moveleft top-3 for “their” (#3 → #4)—on record
- 2026-09-05changeMomentum shift108% → -37%—on record